Bug 1603554

Summary: Last update to 0.35-1 is broken.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Frank Büttner <bugzilla>
Component: spice-gtkAssignee: Marc-Andre Lureau <marcandre.lureau>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 28CC: alon, berrange, cfergeau, fidencio, hdegoede, marcandre.lureau, sandmann, victortoso
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-19 15:47:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Frank Büttner 2018-07-19 15:30:48 UTC 
Problem 1: package virt-viewer-6.0-3.fc28.x86_64 requires libspice-controller.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both spice-glib-0.35-1.fc28.x86_64 and spice-glib-0.34-5.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install both spice-glib-0.34-4.fc28.x86_64 and spice-glib-0.35-1.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package virt-viewer-6.0-3.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package spice-glib-0.34-5.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 2: problem with installed package virt-viewer-6.0-3.fc28.x86_64
  - package virt-viewer-6.0-3.fc28.x86_64 requires libspice-controller.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both spice-glib-0.35-1.fc28.x86_64 and spice-glib-0.34-5.fc28.x86_64
  - cannot install both spice-glib-0.34-4.fc28.x86_64 and spice-glib-0.35-1.fc28.x86_64
  - package spice-gtk-0.35-1.fc28.x86_64 requires spice-glib(x86-64) = 0.35-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package spice-gtk-0.34-5.fc28.x86_64
Comment 1 Fabiano Fidêncio 2018-07-19 15:47:15 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1603059 ***