Bug 1604308

Summary: haproxy: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mohan Boddu <mboddu>
Component: haproxyAssignee: Ryan O'Hara <rohara>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 29CC: bperkins, carlwgeorge, jeremy, rohara
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-08-17 14:41:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1602938    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Mohan Boddu 2018-07-19 22:03:10 UTC 
haproxy failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28187764


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix haproxy at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
haproxy will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 30,
haproxy will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source
Comment 1 Mohan Boddu 2018-07-19 22:03:18 UTC 
Created attachment 1462808 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Mohan Boddu 2018-07-19 22:03:21 UTC 
Created attachment 1462809 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Comment 3 Mohan Boddu 2018-07-19 22:03:25 UTC 
Created attachment 1462813 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Ryan O'Hara 2018-07-30 15:26:21 UTC 
I can't figure out what it going on here. The haproxy builds never had any issues detecting the lua library in the past. I tried using the LUA_LIB_NAME option at build time (as suggested) but it also failed. I took a look at both lua-devel and lua-lib packages in F28 and rawhide and they look mostly the same. Library appears to be /usr/lib61/liblua-5.3.so in both case. Also found no recent changes in haproxy makefile that raise an alarm.
Comment 5 Jan Kurik 2018-08-14 09:34:12 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle.
Changing version to '29'.