Bug 1606922
| Summary: | Anaconda after starting automated install and never completes | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Loren M. Lang <lorenl> | ||||||||||||||
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||||||
| Version: | 28 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, jonathan, kellin, lorenl, mkolman, redhat.com, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vponcova, wwoods | ||||||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2018-11-30 11:21:16 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Description
Loren M. Lang
2018-07-20 23:29:16 UTC
Created attachment 1469619 [details]
anaconda log
Created attachment 1469620 [details]
storage log
Created attachment 1469621 [details]
program log
Created attachment 1469622 [details]
main log
Created attachment 1469623 [details]
console log
Hi, you might try to switch to the graphical mode as a workaround. That does not work for us. These are automated installs using kickstart inside a KVM environment. There is no VGA console nor user to interact with. We do about 40 installs every morning for running various test suites. This issue does not happen with a high percentage, but with as many installs as we do, we see it regularly. (In reply to Loren M. Lang from comment #8) > That does not work for us. These are automated installs using kickstart > inside a KVM environment. There is no VGA console nor user to interact with. > We do about 40 installs every morning for running various test suites. This > issue does not happen with a high percentage, but with as many installs as > we do, we see it regularly. The installation will still be fully automatic and non-interactive, just running with a graphical interface. As long as the GUI can start, it should work around the issue, even if no monitors are connected and no one is actually looking at the GUI. Hi, could you try to run the installation with the following boot option? inst.updates=https://vponcova.fedorapeople.org/f28_dots.img (In reply to Vendula Poncova from comment #10) > Hi, could you try to run the installation with the following boot option? > > inst.updates=https://vponcova.fedorapeople.org/f28_dots.img I've been trying this on a Fedora 29 install and so far seems to be resolving the issues I was seeing with the install getting stuck with repeating dots. Since I started using this I haven't seen a stuck install. Before that I was having stuck installs quite often. I've done about 10 test runs so far. This is done on bare-metal systems under Beaker. (In reply to John Villalovos from comment #11) > I've done about 10 test runs so far. This is done on bare-metal systems > under Beaker. I've been using this for several days now and since I started using it I haven't seen a stuck install. Before I was seeing it about 50% of the time. I would vote for getting the patch merged. The patch is already part of Fedora 29: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/1599 (In reply to Vendula Poncova from comment #13) > The patch is already part of Fedora 29: > https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/1599 Thanks. I discovered the 'install.img' file I was using in our network install did not have that patch for some reason. |