Bug 1607570
Summary: | Split off python scripts | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Colin Walters <walters> |
Component: | nfs-utils | Assignee: | Steve Dickson <steved> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 29 | CC: | bfields, bgilbert, jlayton, steved, walters |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-05-20 15:28:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Colin Walters
2018-07-23 18:53:31 UTC
(In reply to Colin Walters from comment #0) > For [Fedora CoreOS](https://coreos.fedoraproject.org/) we'd like to avoid > shipping Python in the base OS. Today nfs-utils shows up as one of the > things we would like, but includes Python. > > ``` > $ rpm -ql nfs-utils | grep bin/ | xargs grep bin/python > /usr/sbin/mountstats:#!/usr/bin/python3 > /usr/sbin/nfsiostat:#!/usr/bin/python3 > ``` > > Options: > > 1) Split off nfs-utils-core with just the core things like > /usr/sbin/mount.nfs, the services, etc. > 2) Split off nfs-utils-extra with those two scripts > > Something else? Maybe just split off a -extra... leave nfs-utils name the same. So you are taking about having a sub package (%package) of nfs-utils or a completely separate package? > So you are taking about having a sub package (%package)
of nfs-utils or a completely separate package?
I'd probably say sub-package but I really don't have a strong opinion. Do you? If you let us know which you prefer I think we could have someone from the CoreOS team do the work if that's OK by you.
(In reply to Colin Walters from comment #2) > > So you are taking about having a sub package (%package) > of nfs-utils or a completely separate package? > > I'd probably say sub-package but I really don't have a strong opinion. Do > you? If you let us know which you prefer I think we could have someone from > the CoreOS team do the work if that's OK by you. I was thinking a sub package simpler to a -devel package... but I don't know the packaging rules that surround things like that. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1667889 *** |