Bug 1607970

Summary: create an empty rados index object expects client.admin
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Giulio Fidente <gfidente>
Component: Ceph-AnsibleAssignee: Giulio Fidente <gfidente>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: subhash <vpoliset>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.1CC: aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, gcharot, gfidente, gmeno, hnallurv, kdreyer, nthomas, sankarshan, tbarron, tserlin
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 3.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-ansible-3.1.0-0.1.rc12.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph-ansible_3.1.0~rc12-2redhat1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-26 18:23:43 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1578730    

Description Giulio Fidente 2018-07-24 16:00:41 UTC 
create empty rados index from ceph-nfs role fails when distributed as it assumes availability of client.admin locally

this is using ceph-ansible-3.1.0-0.1.rc9

1. https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/blob/master/roles/ceph-nfs/tasks/start_nfs.yml#L11
Comment 5 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2018-07-25 22:31:05 UTC 
The fix is in the upstream stable-3.1 branch, so this fix will be in the next upstream tag after v3.1.0rc10.
Comment 10 subhash 2018-08-14 15:43:03 UTC 
Following the steps from Comment 8 ,
Deployed a ceph 3.1 cluster with nfs role on a dedicated node,it worked fine,Moving to to verified state.
version: ceph-ansible 3.1.0-0.1.rc17.el7cp,ceph 12.2.5-39.el7cp.x86_64
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-26 18:23:43 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2819