Bug 1608027

Summary:	[Sat6.4] Sorting of available minor version repositories is not consistent on new Red Hat Repositories page
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Ashish Humbe <ahumbe>
Component:	Repositories	Assignee:	Michael Johnson <micjohns>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Stephen Wadeley <swadeley>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.4	CC:	cdonnell, jalviso, jturel, micjohns, pcreech, rjerrido, swadeley, walden
Target Milestone:	6.4.0	Keywords:	PrioBumpGSS, PrioBumpPM, Triaged, UserExperience
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	tfm-rubygem-katello-3.7.0.31-1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-10-16 19:32:29 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ashish Humbe 2018-07-24 19:12:20 UTC

Description of problem:

Sorting of available minor version repos is not consistent. 

 Example: When we look for "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server (RPMs)" repos we see "x86_64 7Server" as a first entry. Whereas when we look for "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server (RPMs)" repos then we see "x86_64 6Server" as the last entry and the sorting is like: 

i386 6.1
x86_64 6.1
x86_64 6.10    <<<<  After 6.1 we should see 6.2 instead of 6.10 
i386 6.10
i386 6.2
x86_64 6.2
i386 6.3
...
...
...
x86_64 6Server
i386 6Server

6Server or 7Server are base repositories and these are most commonly used repos so those should be listed as a first entry.

Comment 2 jalviso 2018-07-31 05:27:51 UTC

In this example, 7Server is listed at the top but the sorting is still disordered:

Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack Platform 7.0 director for RHEL 7 (RPMs)
rhel-7-server-openstack-7.0-director-rpms
x86_64 7Server
x86_64 7.2
x86_64 7.3
x86_64 7.0
x86_64 7.1
x86_64 7.4
x86_64 7.5

Comment 9 Walden Raines 2018-08-22 08:35:11 UTC

Created redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24679 from this bug

Comment 10 Satellite Program 2018-09-10 20:04:40 UTC

Upstream bug assigned to micjohns

Comment 11 Satellite Program 2018-09-10 20:04:44 UTC

Upstream bug assigned to micjohns

Comment 12 Satellite Program 2018-09-20 16:04:37 UTC

Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24679 has been resolved.

Comment 13 Patrick Creech 2018-09-21 01:30:30 UTC

Michael,

This failed cherrypick downstream.  Can you take a look?

Comment 14 Jonathon Turel 2018-09-21 14:27:05 UTC

Hello Ashish,

Here's what you can expect from the sorting now: repositories will be sorted in descending order, grouped by architecture. Also, any non y-stream repo (ie 7Server) will be moved to the top as we want to encourage use of those rather than y-stream repositories.

Something like this:

x86_64 6Server
i386 6Server
x86_64 6.10
x86_64 6.9
....
i386 6.10
i386 6.9

Comment 15 Ashish Humbe 2018-09-21 17:37:34 UTC

Thank you Johathon for the update and considering this for GA.

Comment 17 Patrick Creech 2018-09-24 14:45:30 UTC

snap 23, not 63

Comment 20 Bryan Kearney 2018-10-16 19:32:29 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927

Comment 21 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 04:32:02 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days