Bug 1613705
| Summary: | Description of IOPS chart in "Disk Load" section of Brick dashboard is insufficient | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Martin Bukatovic <mbukatov> | ||||
| Component: | web-admin-tendrl-monitoring-integration | Assignee: | gowtham <gshanmug> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Filip Balák <fbalak> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | rhgs-3.4 | CC: | anbehl, apaladug, fbalak, gshanmug, julim, nthomas, rhs-bugs, sankarshan | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream | ||||
| Target Release: | RHGS 3.4.z Batch Update 1 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | tendrl-monitoring-integration-1.6.3-13.el7rhgs | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2018-10-31 08:45:18 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Martin Bukatovic
2018-08-08 08:08:18 UTC
Created attachment 1474192 [details]
screenshot 1: IOPS charts on Brick dashboard
My suggestions are: (1) Change label to “Disk IOPS” (and makes it consistent with the naming in the Host Dashboard. This would make it clearer that this IOPS is different vs. the IOPS panel in the At-A-Glance section. Change description to: The Disk IOPS panel displays the aggregated IOPS of the underlying devices a brick is mounted on. Change the IOPS label in the At-A-Glance to Bricks IOPS. providing acks based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613705#c6 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613705#c7 I'm ok with the proposed changes (as described by Ju above), and propose to tackle the rest of my points (see list below) in WA documentation. * [ ] why there are 2 IOPS charts in the brick dashboard * [ ] how to interpret different values shown on both charts What I saw from code is disk IOPS panels shows Aggregation of value based on the number of input and output happening in devices where the brick belongs to (brick can be created from multiple devices also). So the value is an aggregation of IOPS on brick devices. brick IOPS panels show value when the input and out happening via its mount point only. It only cares about brick mount point. PR is under review: https://github.com/Tendrl/monitoring-integration/pull/567 I have created separate doc BZ 1627835 for tracking of documentation details for: * [ ] why there are 2 IOPS charts in the brick dashboard * [ ] how to interpret different values shown on both charts There are now panels with descriptions: Brick IOPS The IOPS panel displays aggregated read and write operations collected when the brick is part of a volume that has volume profiling enabled. No data will be shown if the volume that the brick is a member of does not have volume profiling enabled. Disk IOPS The Disk IOPS panel displays the aggregated IOPS of the underlying devices a brick is mounted on. As per comments 9 and 13 in this bz is tracked only: * [x] what is the difference between the two panels which is satisfied with the change of panel titles and descriptions. --> VERIFIED Tested with: tendrl-ansible-1.6.3-7.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-api-1.6.3-7.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-api-httpd-1.6.3-7.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-commons-1.6.3-12.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-grafana-plugins-1.6.3-13.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-grafana-selinux-1.5.4-2.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-monitoring-integration-1.6.3-13.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-node-agent-1.6.3-10.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-notifier-1.6.3-4.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-selinux-1.5.4-2.el7rhgs.noarch tendrl-ui-1.6.3-11.el7rhgs.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3427 |