Bug 1613727
Summary: | need to get image_registry from env | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Junqi Zhao <juzhao> |
Component: | Monitoring | Assignee: | Frederic Branczyk <fbranczy> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Junqi Zhao <juzhao> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.11.0 | CC: | fbranczy |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.11.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-10-11 07:24:08 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Junqi Zhao
2018-08-08 08:48:06 UTC
I just opened https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/9477. Could you please test head of that pull request to see if it's fixed? Thanks! (In reply to Frederic Branczyk from comment #1) > I just opened https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/9477. > Could you please test head of that pull request to see if it's fixed? Thanks! issue if fixed, image registry could be got from env, but due to Bug 1613689, prometheus-operator pod could not start up with OCP images. PR could be merged now, thanks https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/9477 is now merged, so this should be fixed, but I also opened https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/9567 to fix the issues raised in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613689. If you could test the head of that new pull request, that would be great. Thanks! (In reply to Frederic Branczyk from comment #3) > https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/9477 is now merged, so > this should be fixed, but I also opened > https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/9567 to fix the issues > raised in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613689. If you could > test the head of that new pull request, that would be great. Thanks! I only can verify it uses ose-configmap-reloader image now - --config-reloader-image=registry.dev.redhat.io/openshift3/ose-configmap-reloader:v3.11.0 But prometheus-operator-9f6cffdb-vrrtf pod is in CrashLoopBackOff status, will open another bug to track # kubectl -n openshift-monitoring get pod NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE cluster-monitoring-operator-9f7578d96-c2m8p 1/1 Running 0 49m prometheus-operator-9f6cffdb-vrrtf 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 13 47m Bug in Comment 4, please see Bug 1615732 @Frederic # kubectl -n openshift-monitoring get pod | grep grafana grafana-7476cc5c4b-pkxpb 2/2 Running 0 1h grafana image name is grafana, but according to [1], "Required card information" part, it seems the image name should be ose-grafana. I am not sure what the image name should be # kubectl -n openshift-monitoring get deployment.apps/grafana -o yaml | grep -i image image: registry.reg-aws.openshift.com:443/openshift3/grafana:v3.11 imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent image: registry.reg-aws.openshift.com:443/openshift3/oauth-proxy:v3.11 imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent ********************************************************************************* [1] https://trello.com/c/zBEHmlss/647-buildauto-build-openshift-monitoring-images Yes sorry, that was misinformation. I was under the impression that Grafana was not previously built for OCP, but it was and it did not have the `ose-` prefix, so we decided to continue to use that name. Meaning this is all correct and as intended, I apologize for the confusion. Could be changed to ON_QA, issue is fixed image_registry is got from env now openshift-ansible version: openshift-ansible-3.11.0-0.20.0.git.0.ec6d8caNone.noarch.rpm openshift-ansible-docs-3.11.0-0.20.0.git.0.ec6d8caNone.noarch.rpm openshift-ansible-playbooks-3.11.0-0.20.0.git.0.ec6d8caNone.noarch.rpm openshift-ansible-roles-3.11.0-0.20.0.git.0.ec6d8caNone.noarch.rpm Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2652 |