Bug 161406
Summary: | Installer created deficient initial root disk image | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Joseph Teichman <joe> | ||||||
Component: | mkinitrd | Assignee: | Peter Jones <pjones> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||
Version: | 4 | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2007-01-22 20:36:34 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Joseph Teichman
2005-06-23 00:26:12 UTC
Please attach your /etc/modprobe.conf ? I had similar problem to that described in several fora: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=59320 mount: error 6 mounting ext3. I have an acer laptop, and found I had to add the following modules to the initrd that comes with fc4, in order to recognise my root partition: ata_piix, libata, sr_mod, sd_mod, scsi_mod Matt Davey I have included my regular /etc/modprobe.conf. I have to question its relevance to this problem though, as we are talking about mkinitrd running in the install system setup and not the regular running filesystem (does in use chroot to run under the filesystem?). I am attaching my mkinitrd just for reference as to what my system needs, but I don't know if it is what my system sees during install time when running from the installation disk. I found that when the install disk goes into rescue mode, there is no /etc/modprobe.conf file on the filesystem (the original modprobe.conf will be available at /mnt/sysimage/etc). You will find a shortened version of modprobe.conf on /tmp/modprobe.conf. I am attaching that too for your reference. But I checked, and they both contain the necessary modules. It could be that for some reason the modprobe.conf file was not available or was messed up only during the system upgrade. I only had a chance to look at the installation's modprobe.conf file now, by putting it in rescue mode with the installation disk. I do not know how mkinitrd is being called within the root system. I suspect that the way that mkinitrd is called within the install system is not the same as it normally would be called. This is in part because the modprobe.conf is not in its normal place, and the modules are also not in their normal place. I could be wrong about this if they 'chroot' into the filesystem first. Since the problem that I had with mkinitrd only came up while the installer was running, and not at other times, I thought that the problem that I experienced was a result of mkinitrd being called improperly or some of the files such as modprobe.conf being set up improperly by the install system. That is why I originally assigned this problem to the anaconda people. They reassigned it to mkinitrd. Created attachment 116515 [details]
/etc/modprobe.conf - of the normal filesystem
Created attachment 116516 [details]
/tmp/modprobe.conf - of the install/resuce system
You might notice that this modprobe.conf also contains modules for sata_promise
as oppose to the filesystem's modprobe.conf. Please be assured that it is not
what is making a difference for two reasons:
1- it is anyway the one that would be available to the install system.
2- I don't use the sata_promise module, it is for the raid controller and I
don't have any raid disks on my system.
mkinitrd won't autodetect LVM if you have LABEL=/ in your fstab. Change it to /dev/vg0/root (or whatever is appropriate) and re-mkinitrd, and you're golden. Not sure if that is what's up here, but that just solved some of my headaches. Thanks for the comments. This goes back a year ago. I hope that it isn't still an issue on the newer versions of Fedora. In any case, I was not using LVM. This report targets the FC3 or FC4 products, which have now been EOL'd. Could you please check that it still applies to a current Fedora release, and either update the target product or close it ? Thanks. I have not experienced this problem with FC5 and FC6, so pursuant to Christian Iseli's request, I am marking this bug "WONTFIX". |