Bug 1614165 (CVE-2018-14939)
| Summary: | CVE-2018-14939 libreoffice: Use of realpath() in desktop/unx/source/start.c:get_app_path() allows for potential buffer overflow | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Sam Fowler <sfowler> |
| Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | caolanm, dtardon, erack, sbergman |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-08-10 14:47:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1614167 | ||
|
Description
Sam Fowler
2018-08-09 06:28:36 UTC
Related to CVE-2018-11236 For one, that get_app_path is only called with argv[0] of LO's oosplash helper executable (installed at /usr/lib.../libreoffice/program/oosplash, called during the LO start-up sequence). So an attack would need launch that executable with a suitably long argv[0]. I don't see how that could happen "if LibreOffice is automatically launched during web browsing with pathnames controlled by a remote web site." (<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14939>) For another, I don't see how that get_app_path uses realpath(3) wrongly. If there is an issue with the glibc implementation of realpath(3), as CVE-2018-11236 states, then it should be necessary and sufficient to fix the issue in glibc, and not in client code calling realpath(3), or am I missing something? Neither do I see how can this cause buffer overflow on Linux. I also can't think of such attack scenario where a path name to oosplash can be controlled by remote web site. For CVE-2018-11236, you're right, that's indeed a separate issue in realpath implementation that might get potentially triggered using this code, but that's out of scope of LO and this issue. Statement: This issue did not affect the versions of libreoffice as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, 6 and 7. |