Bug 1615803
| Summary: | After update to openblas.x86_64 0.3.1-2.fc28 previously working code crashes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul DeStefano <prd-fedora> |
| Component: | openblas | Assignee: | Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 28 | CC: | susi.lehtola |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-01-08 08:09:40 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Paul DeStefano
2018-08-14 09:42:39 UTC
"I upgraded openblas RPM a week ago" Please run dnf update; you're filing a bug against an old version of the package. Argh! Same results with openblas-0.3.2-1.fc28.x86_64. This is serious. I don't know what to do and I need this code to work very very soon. Looks like this is an active ticket upstream https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/1735 Unfortunately it appears that the testing that OpenBLAS upstream performs is not as extensive as one would like... Ah, okay. Thanks for your help! Always willing to troubleshoot, if you have any ideas. Using env var OPENBLAS_NUM_THREADS=1, the code doesn't crash. Does that help? Probably not. I don't know why python would use OpenBLAS since I'm not doing any lin algebra, directly. The code seems to crash when I write a MPL plot to a file, but I don't know if that is coincident with the error or if the problem occurs before or after that point. The error message is useless to me. OPENBLAS_NUM_THREADS=1 is tantamount to disabling parallellization, so it's not surprising you're experiencing fewer issues. Something in your code is doing linear algebra. Numpy probably links to OpenBLAS. I'll wait for upstream to resolve this. I think this was solved in 0.3.3 several months ago. |