Bug 161836

Summary:	xemacs needs libdb.so.3 which is missing from FC4
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Joshua Rosen <bjrosen>
Component:	xemacs	Assignee:	Ville Skyttä <scop>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-06-28 13:01:46 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Joshua Rosen 2005-06-27 17:08:19 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4

Description of problem:
I installed Xemacs with yum, it won't run because you left out libdb.so.3.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install from yum (it's missing on the CDROMs)
2. xemacs
3.
  

Actual Results:  xemacs
xemacs: error while loading shared libraries: libdb.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2005-06-28 00:11:07 UTC

XEmacs was moved to Fedora Extras for FC4.

Which version of xemacs do you have installed?

xemacs-21.4.17-3 from extras runs fine for me.

You must be running a rather old xemacs build anyway, since db
support was disabled from our xemacs package a long while ago.

Comment 2 Joshua Rosen 2005-06-28 00:59:29 UTC

Not your fault. The problem is that FC4 put /usr/local/bin into the default path
and the /usr/local/bin had a bunch of old versions of Xemacs in it. When I
changed the path it finds the current version of Xemacs which works.

Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2005-06-28 13:01:46 UTC

Thanks for the quick followup; setting resolved as NOTABUG because there's 
nothing wrong in the XEmacs package in this respect.