Bug 1622312
| Summary: | golang 1.11 breaks snapd compilation on s390x | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Neal Gompa <ngompa13> | ||||
| Component: | golang | Assignee: | Vincent Batts <vbatts> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 29 | CC: | amurdaca, awilliam, dan, gmarr, hannsj_uhl, jcajka, lemenkov, ngompa13, renich, vbatts | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | s390x | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | AcceptedFreezeException | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | golang-1.11-1.fc29 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-18 06:20:12 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 467765, 1517012 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Neal Gompa
2018-08-25 20:32:30 UTC
The update to golang 1.11 final seemed to fix it, and I was able to submit an update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/snapd-2.35-1.fc29 snapd-2.35-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d6660293c6 Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 29-beta by Fedora user ngompa using the blocker tracking app because: golang 1.11rc2 prevented me from updating snapd for F29 and Rawhide. After I noticed golang 1.11 final was available, I tried again and it built. I'd like the proposed update to snapd-2.35-1.fc29[1] to be granted an FE so that upgrade from F28 to F29 will work. [1]: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d6660293c6 Discussed at 2018-09-10 freeze exception review meeting: https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2018-09-10/f29-blocker-review.2018-09-10-16.01.html . Reading the discussion and the proposal, I think there's been some confusion here. The meeting clearly voted on the topic of whether golang 1.11 should be granted a freeze exception in order to help things build on s390x...but Neal seems to have been proposing a freeze exception for *snapd* on the grounds of fixing upgrades. Given that the vote and the proposal were so clearly mismatched, I'm gonna say we should leave this as proposal and vote on it again when we're clearer what we're voting about. Neal, if you in fact want an FE for the snapd build, please make the bug explain this more clearly. I'm assuming you used a buildroot override to get snapd built? If so, we also have a bit of a problem, as the golang update and the snapd update are separate. It would seem technically wrong to push either without the other. golang-1.11-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-35eaad95d3 > Neal, if you in fact want an FE for the snapd build, please make the bug explain this more clearly. I'm assuming you used a buildroot override to get snapd built? If so, we also have a bit of a problem, as the golang update and the snapd update are separate. It would seem technically wrong to push either without the other.
Yeah, both golang and snapd need to be pushed. I'm fairly certain I did this all wrong, but I'll go with I didn't know what I was doing more than anything else...
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #4) > Discussed at 2018-09-10 freeze exception review meeting: > https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2018-09-10/f29- > blocker-review.2018-09-10-16.01.html . > > Reading the discussion and the proposal, I think there's been some confusion > here. The meeting clearly voted on the topic of whether golang 1.11 should > be granted a freeze exception in order to help things build on s390x...but > Neal seems to have been proposing a freeze exception for *snapd* on the > grounds of fixing upgrades. > > Given that the vote and the proposal were so clearly mismatched, I'm gonna > say we should leave this as proposal and vote on it again when we're clearer > what we're voting about. > > Neal, if you in fact want an FE for the snapd build, please make the bug > explain this more clearly. I'm assuming you used a buildroot override to get > snapd built? If so, we also have a bit of a problem, as the golang update > and the snapd update are separate. It would seem technically wrong to push > either without the other. Now this time I'm properly replying... Both snapd and golang are in Bodhi, they're just separate updates for unfortunate reasons. They are now both properly attached to this ticket, so at least you'll know which updates to push for FE. Discussed during the 2018-08-20 blocker review meeting: [1] The decision to classify this bug as an "AcceptedFreezeException" was made to resolve snapd upgrade path issues. [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2018-09-17/f29-blocker-review.2018-09-17-16.02.txt Correction to comment 8: Discussed during the 2018-09-17 blocker review meeting: golang-1.11-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. snapd-2.35-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |