Bug 162328

Summary: little change in the rc.sysinit output
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nadav Kavalerchik <nadavkav>
Component: initscriptsAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: rvokal, sundaram
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 19:41:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nadav Kavalerchik 2005-07-02 19:21:27 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.4; Linux 2.6.11-1.1383_FC5; X11; i686; en_US, he) KHTML/3.4.1 (like Gecko)

Description of problem:
i've changed line 410 in the file /etc/rc.d/init.d/funtions 
from:  echo -n "$STRING "   
to:  echo -n -e "$STRING "  
(added -e param so it can pharse \x codes) 
 
i've changed line 486 in the file /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit 
from: action $"Mounting local filesystems: " mount -a -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs 
-O no_netdev 
to: action $"Mounting local filesystems: \n" mount -a -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs -O 
no_netdev 
(added \n) 
 
all this is just for a little more readable output 
 
kindly, 
nadav :-) 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
8.11.1-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.booting  
2.  
3.  
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Rahul Sundaram 2005-08-13 23:45:46 UTC
can you supply this as a patch.Next time you file in a bug, put in a better
subject like "Patch to enhance readability" or something like that.

Comment 2 Nadav Kavalerchik 2005-08-14 08:04:51 UTC
i'd love to, but i don't know how to make a patch :-( 

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2005-10-03 21:24:23 UTC
I'm not sure what the purpose is here - why do you want an extra newline in the
output?

Comment 4 Nadav Kavalerchik 2005-10-05 07:06:34 UTC
because... 
when something goes wrong with the mount command, the output gets cluttered and 
just for the sake of visual clarity i added a newline. 
(it a very lowww priority issue) 

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2005-10-05 19:41:13 UTC
I'd rather not change these strings and require retranslation for that.