Bug 162411

Summary:	4 * is used uninitialized in this function
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	David Binderman <dcb314>
Component:	pilot-link	Assignee:	Ivana Varekova <varekova>
Status:	CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	alex
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-02-11 11:56:05 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David Binderman 2005-07-04 10:57:26 UTC

Description of problem:

I just tried to compile package pilot-link-0.12.0-0.pre3.2 from Redhat
Fedora Core development tree with the gcc 4.0.0 compiler and the
compiler flag -Wall.

The compiler said

1.

install-datebook.c:223: warning: 'Appointment_buf' is used uninitialized in this
function

The source code is

	pack_Appointment(&appointment, Appointment_buf, datebook_v1);

I agree with the compiler. Suggest initialise local variable
"Appointment_buf" before first use.

2.

read-screenshot.c:105: warning: 'f' is used uninitialized in this function

The source code is

        fclose (f);

I agree with the compiler. Suggest initialise local variable
"f" before first use. You can only fclose something that has been
fopened, but this happens later in the same function.

3.

money2qif.c:109: warning: 'index' is used uninitialized in this function

The source code is

        if (index >= 0) {

I agree with the compiler. Suggest initialise local variable
"index" before first use.

4.

versamail-test.c:207: warning: 'r' is used uninitialized in this function

The source code is

	print_versamail_app_info(r, record, size);

I agree with the compiler. Suggest initialise local variable
"r" before first use.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Alex Lancaster 2007-11-12 12:43:05 UTC

Is this still a problem?  Unlikely to still be a problem (original bug reported
back in 2005) since now 0.12.2 compiles fine on rawhide.