Bug 1624291

Summary:	[sack] rpmdb version is incorrect when using excludes
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Daniel Mach <dmach>
Component:	dnf	Assignee:	Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dmach, jmracek, mblaha, packaging-team-maint, rpm-software-management, vmukhame
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	dnf-4.0.4-1.fc29	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-10-22 16:13:22 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Daniel Mach 2018-08-31 07:46:22 UTC

If excludes are specified on command line or config file,
they hide even installed RPMs (base.sack.query().installed())

This affects how rpmdb version for the history database is computed.

An option how to implement it is to move computing rpmdb version into libdnf and use query with HY_IGNORE_EXCLUDES flag.

Comment 1 Jaroslav Mracek 2018-10-05 10:28:05 UTC

I create a patch that should solve the issue (https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1234).

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2018-10-15 12:28:57 UTC

dnf-plugins-core-4.0.0-1.fc29 dnf-4.0.4-1.fc29 libdnf-0.22.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2789f6b6e7

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2018-10-15 18:23:29 UTC

dnf-4.0.4-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-core-4.0.0-1.fc29, libdnf-0.22.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2789f6b6e7

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2018-10-17 13:02:00 UTC

dnf-4.0.4-1.fc29 dnf-plugins-core-4.0.0-2.fc29 libdnf-0.22.0-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2789f6b6e7

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2018-10-17 23:30:54 UTC

dnf-4.0.4-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-core-4.0.0-2.fc29, libdnf-0.22.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2789f6b6e7

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2018-10-18 14:06:47 UTC

anaconda-29.24.6-1.fc29 dnf-4.0.4-1.fc29 dnf-plugins-core-4.0.0-2.fc29 libblockdev-2.20-2.fc29 libdnf-0.22.0-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2789f6b6e7

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2018-10-20 19:22:24 UTC

anaconda-29.24.7-1.fc29, dnf-4.0.4-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-core-4.0.0-2.fc29, libblockdev-2.20-2.fc29, libdnf-0.22.0-5.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2789f6b6e7

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2018-10-22 16:13:22 UTC

anaconda-29.24.7-1.fc29, dnf-4.0.4-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-core-4.0.0-2.fc29, libblockdev-2.20-2.fc29, libdnf-0.22.0-5.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.