Bug 1624479

Summary: Show Repo Label on Enabled repos results
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Roxanne Hoover <rohoover>
Component: RepositoriesAssignee: Avi Sharvit <asharvit>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jameer Pathan <jpathan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.4CC: asharvit, egolov, ehelms, jpathan, mmccune, pcreech, pgagne, rohoover
Target Milestone: 6.5.0Keywords: Triaged, UserExperience
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: tfm-rubygem-katello-3.9.0-0 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1646746 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-05-14 12:37:51 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Proposal for repo labels placement
none
verification screenshot none

Description Roxanne Hoover 2018-08-31 18:24:54 UTC 
Description of problem:

Display the repo label on the enabled repos results

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

6.4 Repositories page

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Ensure a repo is enabled
2. View results

Actual results:

No repo label on the enabled repo entries though they are present in the Available repos column.

Expected results:

Show Repo Label for both Available and Enabled repos.

Additional info:

Hilti
Comment 2 Tomas Strachota 2018-09-05 11:52:34 UTC 
Hi Roxanne,
I remember we were talking about this one in a meeting but I forgot the details.

Should the repo set label in enabled repos list be displayed instead of architecture and version? For example "rhel-7-server-rhn-tools-rpms" instead of "x86_64 7.1"? See my attached screenshot that demonstrates this alternative.

Or should it be displayed together with arch and version?

Or did I misunderstood it completely and you're proposing something completely different?
Comment 3 Tomas Strachota 2018-09-05 11:52:55 UTC 
Created attachment 1481083 [details]
Proposal for repo labels placement
Comment 4 Avi Sharvit 2018-09-05 14:47:48 UTC 
Created redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24827 from this bug
Comment 5 Avi Sharvit 2018-09-05 16:04:31 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to asharvit
Comment 6 Satellite Program 2018-09-05 16:09:24 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to asharvit
Comment 7 Satellite Program 2018-09-05 16:09:27 UTC 
Upstream bug assigned to asharvit
Comment 8 Satellite Program 2018-09-05 20:09:23 UTC 
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24827 has been resolved.
Comment 9 Tomas Strachota 2018-09-06 07:23:00 UTC 
My question was answered in a PR, removing needinfo.
Comment 10 Patrick Creech 2018-09-19 13:46:34 UTC 
Avi,

This failed to cherry-pick downstream, can you take a look?
Comment 14 Jameer Pathan 2018-11-12 11:34:42 UTC 
verified:

@satellite 6.5.0 snap 3

observation:
Repo Label for both Available and Enabled repos.
Comment 15 Jameer Pathan 2018-11-12 11:35:54 UTC 
Created attachment 1504667 [details]
verification screenshot
Comment 17 John Mitsch 2019-01-04 18:52:17 UTC 
*** Bug 1614423 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2019-05-14 12:37:51 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1222