Bug 162763

Summary: i586 kernel modules show wrong arch in vermagic
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Chris Evich <cevich>
Component: cman-kernelAssignee: Chris Feist <cfeist>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-29 21:03:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Chris Evich 2005-07-08 13:36:43 UTC
Description of problem:
Have a somewhat FC4 box that I'm trying to setup as a gnbd server.  All the
cluster stuff installed fine and without error (after manually finding and
resolving upgrade dependencies).  When trying to load any of the cluster modules
I get a "Invalid module format" error.  Looking in messages it indicates the
vermagic is wrong for the module.  Further investigation shows:

# QF='%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n'
# rpm -q --qf "$QF" cman-kernel
cman-kernel-2.6.11.5-20050601.152643.FC4.2.i586
# modinfo -F vermagic cman
2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 686 REGPARM 4KSTACKS gcc-4.0
# rpm -q --qf "$QF" dlm-kernel
dlm-kernel-2.6.11.5-20050601.152643.FC4.2.i586
# modinfo -F vermagic dlm
2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 686 REGPARM 4KSTACKS gcc-4.0
# rpm -q --qf "$QF" gnbd-kernel
gnbd-kernel-2.6.11.2-20050420.133124.FC4.35.i586
# modinfo -F vermagic gnbd
2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 686 REGPARM 4KSTACKS gcc-4.0
# uname -vrpimo
2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 #1 Thu Jun 2 22:53:35 EDT 2005 i586 i586 i386 GNU/Linux
# rpm -q --qf "$QF" gcc
gcc-4.0.0-0.40.i386
# rpm -q --qf "$QF" glibc glibc-kernheaders
glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.i386
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.87.i386
#

As you can see, the i586 packages are installed but the actual modules are
tagged i686, perhaps there was a mistake building from the SRPM?

Comment 1 Chris Evich 2005-07-19 11:52:21 UTC
Found the same to be true for the GFS modules as well.  Also checked the later
2.6.12-1398 kernel, it has the same problem.

Comment 2 Chris Feist 2005-07-19 19:44:23 UTC
The problem is caused by looking for kernel devel information in
/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build we need to be looking for that information in
/usr/src/kernels/`unamr -r`-i586.  I'll work on getting this fixed.

Comment 3 Chris Feist 2006-09-29 21:03:47 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 165603 ***