Bug 1628520
| Summary: | User unable to retire his owned service from Self service portal | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Niladri Roy <niroy> | ||||||
| Component: | API | Assignee: | Gregg Tanzillo <gtanzill> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Niyaz Akhtar Ansari <nansari> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||
| Version: | 5.9.6 | CC: | david.thomas, dmetzger, duhlmann, jocarter, lavenel, mshriver, nchugh, niroy, obarenbo, tfitzger | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | GA | ||||||||
| Target Release: | 5.10.z | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2019-04-30 19:12:37 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Niladri Roy
2018-09-13 10:27:00 UTC
Created attachment 1483109 [details]
Services Permissions for role Copied-EvmRole-user_self_service
Created attachment 1483110 [details]
SUI permissions for retire
May I've a reproducer that's alive, please? Or a log link that doesn't 404? Hi Drew, I have re-downloaded the logs at http://collab-shell.usersys.redhat.com/02179065/ ERROR: [----] E, [2018-09-10T17:06:57.319693 #7392:ad6fb0] ERROR -- : MIQ(Api::TasksController.api_error) Api::ForbiddenError: Use of the read action is forbidden I think this error is due to this permission, when this below role permission was ON, the error didn't appear Everything > Services > Requests > Operate > Approve and Deny I was working on a separate case where I noticed this behaviour in 5.10.0.33 as well. Please see BZ 1701098 Hey Tina, per the last line of comment 13, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701098 is similar. Could I please get your opinion on how this is supposed to work? |