Bug 1630362

Summary: Obsolete channel sought.conf should be removed
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Simon Matter <simon.matter>
Component: spamassassinAssignee: Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Ondrej Mejzlik <omejzlik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.2CC: omejzlik, pb, psklenar, redhat-bugzilla, thozza
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: AutoVerified, EasyFix, Patch, TestCaseProvided, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: spamassassin-3.4.2-8.el8 Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-04 02:29:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch none

Description Simon Matter 2018-09-18 13:03:58 UTC 
Description of problem:
Spamassassin installs /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d/sought.conf which is obsolete now because it's not used anymore.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7

How reproducible:
Check for /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d/sought.conf

Actual results:
The sought.conf file is in /etc/mail/spamassassin/channel.d/

Expected results:
sought.conf should not be there

Additional info:
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SoughtRules says
'Update: this is no longer active, and should not be used.'
Comment 2 Ondřej Lysoněk 2019-11-18 16:06:29 UTC 
Moved to RHEL-8. The file is still present in spamassassin-3.4.2-7.el8.x86_64.
Comment 3 Simon Matter 2020-01-03 05:59:23 UTC 
I'm wondering if it was correct to move this to RHEL-8 as it was never fixed in RHEL-7, was it?
Comment 4 Ondřej Lysoněk 2020-01-03 09:30:24 UTC 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 7 entered the Maintenance Support 1 Phase in
August 2019. In this phase only qualified Critical and Important Security
errata advisories (RHSAs) and Urgent Priority Bug Fix errata advisories (RHBAs)
may be released as they become available. Other errata advisories may be
delivered as appropriate.

This bug has been reviewed by Support and Engineering representative and does
not meet the inclusion criteria for Maintenance Support 1 Phase.

For more information about Red Hat Enterprise Linux Lifecycle, please see
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
Comment 5 Ondřej Lysoněk 2020-03-18 14:02:50 UTC 
Created attachment 1671065 [details]
patch
Comment 14 Pavel Zhukov 2020-10-23 06:55:57 UTC 
*** Bug 1890852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2020-11-04 02:29:52 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: spamassassin security update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4625