Bug 1631878
Summary: | new AWS instance types - m5,r5,c5, etc. - missing in Sat6 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Dan Yocum <dyocum> | ||||||
Component: | Compute Resources - EC2 | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED MIGRATED | QA Contact: | Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list> | ||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
Version: | 6.3.0 | CC: | apatel, bbuckingham, biholmes, bkearney, jpasqual, kgaikwad, lhellebr, pcreech, rjerrido, rlavi | ||||||
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | MigratedToJIRA, Triaged | ||||||
Target Release: | Unused | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | tfm-rubygem-fog-aws-3.6.5 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2024-06-05 21:30:54 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Dan Yocum
2018-09-21 19:18:29 UTC
Version is 6.3 Foreman compute resources uses fog-aws as the client to EC2. This is where the flavors are defined. Even in upstream, there are missing instance types (m5d, t3, etc). https://github.com/fog/fog-aws As you can see[1] the more modern instance types are not listed. 1: https://github.com/fog/fog-aws/blob/master/lib/fog/aws/models/compute/flavors.rb Description of problem: While creating the host using hammer command, cu can able to specify any flavor using the compute-attributes argument hammer host create --compute-attributes="flavor_id=t3.micro" But some of the AWS instances (like t3 instances) are not available on the Satellite WEBUI. Satellite Version - 6.5.1 I'm not sure what I should check here. Only the flavors that are mentioned here? Or check that flavors offered in Satellite match those accessible in AWS (through WebUI for example)? Because they don't. For example, r6gd.xlarge is only on web and g3dn.xlarge is only on Satellite. That even means it's possible to select a flavor that is not on the AWS at all, leading to error: ``` Unable to save Failed to create a compute ec2-4 (us-west-2-EC2) instance adam-mcgown.hpe2.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com: InvalidParameterValue => Invalid value 'g3dn.xlarge' for InstanceType. ``` Setting to failed as this doesn't seem fixed to me. Please let me know if you insist on just verifying the flavors mentioned here, in that case I'll report a new BZ. Yes, I can confirm this still happens on 6.11. There are flavors listed in Satellite which I can't see in AWS and there are flavors in AWS which I can't see on Satellite. The difference is huge, there are 557 flavors on AWS and 276 on Satellite, plus bear in mind some of those are not common in these two sets. I think this problem will last as long as the flavors are hardcoded in fog-aws. Attaching the current list of flavors available on AWS (note that some of them are greyed-out in AWS WebUI - however, there are some that are not greyed out and are missing in Satellite) and Satellite. Created attachment 1903532 [details]
on_sat.txt
Created attachment 1903533 [details]
on_aws.txt
Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team. Thank you. Based upon feedback during auto-closure, leaving this bugzilla open a while longer for additional discussion; however, it may be closed in a future iteration. This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there. Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated. Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information. To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "SAT-" followed by an integer. You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like: "Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567 In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information. The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days |