Bug 163237

Summary:	GUI allows cluster node and fence device to have the same name
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite	Reporter:	Mustafa Mahudhawala <mmahudha>
Component:	redhat-config-cluster	Assignee:	Jim Parsons <jparsons>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4	CC:	cluster-maint
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHBA-2005-753	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-10-07 16:48:55 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mustafa Mahudhawala 2005-07-14 12:42:27 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0

Description of problem:
Allowing the cluster node and fence devices to share the same name, causes problems with Relax-NG validation later.

Relax-NG validity error : Extra element fencedevices in interleave 
/etc/cluster/cluster.conf:21: element fencedevices: Relax-NG validity error : Element cluster failed to validate content 
/etc/cluster/cluster.conf fails to validate 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-cluster-1.0.12-1.0

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Create a conf file using system-config-cluster with cluster node and fence device having the same name.

Actual Results:  Allows to create a cluster conf file where fence device and cluster node share the same name.

Expected Results:  Should not allow.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Stanko Kupcevic 2005-07-26 15:40:20 UTC

Fixed in Errata Candidate

Comment 2 Corey Marthaler 2005-09-06 22:04:29 UTC

fixed verified in 1.0.15

Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-07 16:48:56 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-753.html