Bug 163262
Summary: | Installer won't boot from SCSI CD drive | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthew Saltzman <mjs> |
Component: | syslinux | Assignee: | Peter Jones <pjones> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6 | CC: | djschaap, triage |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | bzcl34nup | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-06 15:30:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matthew Saltzman
2005-07-14 15:44:04 UTC
Wierd. I also have an old P5-133 with a BusLogic BT-950. Just installed from the same disks with no problem. This report targets the FC3 or FC4 products, which have now been EOL'd. Could you please check that it still applies to a current Fedora release, and either update the target product or close it ? Thanks. Still an issue in FC6. Consoe messages: ISOLINUX 3.11 2005-09-02 isolinux: Loading spec packet failed, trying to wing it... isolinux: Found something at drive=9F isolinux: Found something at drive=81 isolinux: Found something at drive=80 isolinux: Looks like it might be right, continuing... isolinux: Image checksum error, sorry... Boot failed: press a key to retry... Sorry, missed the checkbox for NEEDINFO. When I attempt to boot of FC6 disc 1, I get a short delay and then this: ISOLINUX 3.11 2005-09-02 Copyright (C) 1994-2005 H. Peter Anvin isolinux: Disk error 80, AX = 4241, drive 9F Boot failed: press a key to retry... Disk images downloaded via BitTorrent earlier today. I've burned two CDs so far (burned on the same drive I'm booting from -- SCSI CD-RW). Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers This bug is open for a Fedora version that is no longer maintained and will not be fixed by Fedora. Therefore we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen thus bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |