Bug 163268
Summary: | No libopenal.so symlink | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Kenneth Porter <shiva> |
Component: | openal | Assignee: | Phillip Compton <compton> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | extras-qa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-07-14 21:32:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Kenneth Porter
2005-07-14 17:38:45 UTC
Not a bug. The symlink is in the openal-devel package where it belongs. The game must not dlopen it, but libopenal.so.0 instead. Where can I found out more about the semantics of the version number encoded in the filename? I was unaware of this rule and haven't come across it any documentation. Answering my own question, I found the required info in the GCC HOWTO Linking section, which can be found here: http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/GCC-HOWTO.html#AEN575 |