Bug 163403

Summary: file browser.dat has wrong permissions 644 chnaged to 666
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Darwin H. Webb <thethirddoorontheleft>
Component: sambaAssignee: Jay Fenlason <fenlason>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4CC: jfeeney
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=306484#post306484
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-01-21 04:10:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Darwin H. Webb 2005-07-15 21:00:07 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.9) Gecko/20050711 Firefox/1.0.5

Description of problem:
Access denied on browser.dat after install.
Changed from 644 to 666

see thsi link for details
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=306484#post306484 

Orinigally part of bug# 158116

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
samba-3.0.14a, 20pre1, 20pre2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install samba-3.0.20pre and 
ls -aZ on file browser.dat in sambe
rw r r  ... s/b rw rw rw
2.
3.
  

Actual Results:  Most of all of Samba started working correctly with no erros in any log files.

Expected Results:  Only hopping for the above , it was the fix but it s/b that way on install.
And it may only need to be 664 or 646?

Additional info:

It was a bit of a moving target for versions
Samba-3.0.20pre2 and SELinux-1-25-2-4 were the final

Comment 1 Christian Iseli 2007-01-20 00:44:23 UTC
This report targets the FC3 or FC4 products, which have now been EOL'd.

Could you please check that it still applies to a current Fedora release, and
either update the target product or close it ?

Thanks.

Comment 2 Darwin H. Webb 2007-01-21 04:10:30 UTC
Didn't know I was supposed to close bugs.

Nope, close is not an option from the submitter.

But yes, it can be closed.

Darwin