Bug 163429

Summary:	Reiser4 if usable with SELinux to make it in FC5?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Steve <steve.t.armstrong>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint>
Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	wtogami
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-07-19 13:44:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Steve 2005-07-16 06:46:29 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050524 Fedora/1.0.4-4 Firefox/1.0.4

Description of problem:
Reiser4 with or without SELinux..
This is of no importance except for my curiosity. I'm wondering if testing between reiser4 with selinux proves to be compatible, will it be included in Fedora 5 as a format choice? I understand why reiserfs is not supported, but if reiser4 had success with selinux as much as ext3 has then will it make it in FC5?
I also wish to say even if reiser4 is not compatable with selinux give more support for it and reiserfs3 so I can try it out. I've read different results of performance, but I would like to try these file systems to see which one I like better. While inevitably if reiser4 also proved incompatable with selinux, after trying it out I would goback to ext3 with selinux, but I would still like to try it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 5: kernal, anaconda, selinux

How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
N/A
1.
2.
3.
  

Additional info:

Comment 1 Dan Carpenter 2005-07-16 21:54:24 UTC

Reiser4 isn't even included in the upstream kernel yet so I'd file that under
"unlikely".

Comment 2 Dave Jones 2005-07-19 13:44:19 UTC

needs upstream acceptance before it goes anywhere near a distro