Bug 1635392
| Summary: | Mutter Causing Odd/Bad Button Mapping Behavior on Wacom Tablets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Michael Boisvert <mboisver> | |
| Component: | mutter | Assignee: | Carlos Garnacho <cgarnach> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> | |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | Marie Hornickova <mdolezel> | |
| Priority: | high | |||
| Version: | 7.6 | CC: | bgollahe, btissoir, cgarnach, mboisver, mclasen, nobody+bgollahe, peter.hutterer, rstrode, salmy, toneata, tpelka | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression, ZStream | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | 7.0 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: |
Button mapping does not work on Wacom tablets
After upgrading the _mutter_ package to version mutter-3.28.3-2.el7 or newer, button mapping and the scroll wheel function mapping does not work on Wacom tablets.
Consequently, the mapped function does not occur after pressing the button.
To work around this problem ...
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1637822 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-08-06 12:37:45 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1637822 | |||
|
Description
Michael Boisvert
2018-10-02 19:46:51 UTC
Hi Michael, This bug is on the list of candidates to be described in RHEL 7.6 Release Notes. I tried to create the initial draft description according to the information that you've provided in the very first comment. Please, could you review the doc text whether it is accurate content-wise and add the work around? Another question is that whether this should be described as a known issue or whether it's expected that it'll be fixed with 7.6 GA release and that case I should wait with the description until it's fixed? Thanks a lot for your help! Marie (In reply to Marie Dolezelova from comment #12) > Hi Michael, > > This bug is on the list of candidates to be described in RHEL 7.6 Release > Notes. > > I tried to create the initial draft description according to the information > that you've provided in the very first comment. > > Please, could you review the doc text whether it is accurate content-wise > and add the work around? > > Another question is that whether this should be described as a known issue > or whether it's expected that it'll be fixed with 7.6 GA release and that > case I should wait with the description until it's fixed? > > Thanks a lot for your help! > > Marie Marie, there is no real workaround apart from clicking and holding the button you desire. It is fixed as a 7.6.z 0day. (In reply to Michael Boisvert from comment #13) > (In reply to Marie Dolezelova from comment #12) > > Hi Michael, > > > > This bug is on the list of candidates to be described in RHEL 7.6 Release > > Notes. > > > > I tried to create the initial draft description according to the information > > that you've provided in the very first comment. > > > > Please, could you review the doc text whether it is accurate content-wise > > and add the work around? > > > > Another question is that whether this should be described as a known issue > > or whether it's expected that it'll be fixed with 7.6 GA release and that > > case I should wait with the description until it's fixed? > > > > Thanks a lot for your help! > > > > Marie > > Marie, there is no real workaround apart from clicking and holding the > button you desire. It is fixed as a 7.6.z 0day. Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for this info. If it is fixed as a 7.6.z 0day, does it mean that we do not need the description of this known issue for Release Notes? Thank you! Marie OK, so I got the info from my colleague that what is fixed as 7.6 0 day does not come into RN. So I'm removing this from Release Notes repo. (In reply to Marie Dolezelova from comment #15) > OK, so I got the info from my colleague that what is fixed as 7.6 0 day does > not come into RN. So I'm removing this from Release Notes repo. That is correct. Verified on mutter-3.28.3-10.el7. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2044 |