Bug 1635685
| Summary: | [RFE] Create warning for the users, not to create large sync plans, and rather use smaller batches. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Stefan Nemeth <snemeth> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Sergei Petrosian <spetrosi> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Melanie Corr <mcorr> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.3.3 | CC: | adahms, bkearney, daniele, daviddavis, ktordeur, pmoravec, spetrosi |
| Target Milestone: | Released | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-11-09 15:58:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Stefan Nemeth
2018-10-03 13:30:58 UTC
Assigning to Sergei for review. We really can't specify anything more specific because "large" is highly dependent on the resources of the system--it could be 5 or it could be 50+. I'd recommend perhaps saying that users are encouraged to split up sync plans as much as possible to avoid placing a heavy load on the system. I am not sure how useful that would be. There are a lot of variables and some variables might affect how many repositories you can sync at one time. So unless you happen to have the same system specs, it won't be useful. While customer can ask for particular numbers, these rely a lot on too many factors, including (not only): - number of repos in a product in sync plan - number of repos/errata/packages-in-errata in a repo - size of mongo DB (affects search/insert times there) - I/O performance (physical disk speed, latency, filesystem,..) - CPU load (candlepin or puppet can generate high load) - Satellite version (that improves performance a lot, incl. inside pulp) - number of CPU cores, pulp workers and their proportion So we might come with some safe low value that is supposed to work either time, and warn "the bigger plan than this you use, the highly probable BZ1635679 happens" ? We would prefer to improve the issues and to provide better tuning guidance. Closing this out as WONTFIX. Clearing NEEDINFO. |