Bug 163611
| Summary: | ia64: Unaligned accesses are made when udev starts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Prarit Bhargava <prarit> |
| Component: | udev | Assignee: | Harald Hoyer <harald> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | notting, prarit |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | ia64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-04-13 06:11:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163350 | ||
|
Description
Prarit Bhargava
2005-07-19 14:35:32 UTC
what does -ftz do? Something to do with -force-to-zero or -flush-to-zero for the floating point stuff, I think. Shouldn't be relelvant. I'd suspect the patches that Kay posted to the list for it SIGBUSing on sparc might be more relevant here. Whups -- the -ftz thing was a mistake. Had a brain spasm ... P. Does the last patch in http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7720331&forum_id=3157 work for you? Bill, The link pushes me to the general list -- not a specific set of patches. Can you attach the patch here/email it to me? Thanks, P. See the next-to-last mail in the thread:
diff --git a/udev_rules_parse.c b/udev_rules_parse.c
--- a/udev_rules_parse.c
+++ b/udev_rules_parse.c
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ static int add_to_rules(struct udev_rule
int valid;
char *linepos;
char *attr;
+ size_t padding;
int retval;
/* get all the keys */
@@ -506,6 +507,11 @@ static int add_to_rules(struct udev_rule
/* grow buffer and add rule */
rule_size = sizeof(struct udev_rule) + rule->bufsize;
+ padding = (sizeof(size_t) - rule_size % sizeof(size_t)) % sizeof(size_t);
+ dbg("add %zi padding bytes", padding);
+ rule_size += padding;
+ rule->bufsize += padding;
+
rules->buf = realloc(rules->buf, rules->bufsize + rule_size);
if (!rules->buf) {
err("realloc failed");
That looks like it fixes it .... Thanks Bill. P. Did 063-x fix this for you? This is fixed. |