Bug 1636872
| Summary: | allow creating or deleting volumes back to back without the need of delay (ie get rid of sleep of 2 sec) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Nag Pavan Chilakam <nchilaka> |
| Component: | glusterd | Assignee: | Atin Mukherjee <amukherj> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Bala Konda Reddy M <bmekala> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rhgs-3.4 | CC: | jmulligan, nchilaka, rhs-bugs, sankarshan, storage-qa-internal, vbellur |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-10-12 05:49:04 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1637787 | ||
|
Description
Nag Pavan Chilakam
2018-10-08 07:36:16 UTC
"if we have multiple volumes which we want to create/delete or if we want to create multiple vols, back to back, we need to put a sleep of 2 seconds, so as to avoid stale brick processes related issues." - What's the justification on the stale brick process here? What am I missing? Mind to point to a BZ? Also why the Internal Whiteboard has been marked as 3.4.1? Are you proposing this as blocker to 3.4.1? Again, what's the justification? > Also, on another node, I am not sure if heketi/OCS provision takes care of inducing sleep of 2 sec.
No, to the best of my knowledge Heketi does not enforce a delay or sleep of 2 seconds between volume deletes.
This is also the first I've heard of this recommendation. I couldn't find it in the docs you linked to, but I'm not sure if you were saying that it should be added to the docs or was noted in the docs. If the latter, an excerpt from the docs might be useful.
Needinfo should remain to the reporter as I haven't seen the response yet on my questions :-) |