Bug 163715
Summary: | RFE: add incremental backup functionality | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe> |
Component: | pax | Assignee: | Peter Vrabec <pvrabec> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-06 11:55:32 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Patrick C. F. Ernzer
2005-07-20 16:10:16 UTC
BZ #163716 has been also opened requesting the same from pax. IIRC the consensus on tech-list was that while both star and pax are not perfect, pax is preferable. Do u think pax is good alternative? It doesn't support EAs and ACLs, does it. Patrick, I think this bug is not relevant since we have star and tar>=1.15.90-6 with incremental backup functionality and EAs and ACLs support. It would be significant amount of work to add this functionality to pax. Peter, fair enough if tar>=1.15.90-6 now supports EAs and ACLs the aim of having our amanda package making a real backup again (i.e. with EA and ACL) is fulfilled. Will 1.15.90-6 that go into RHEL5 (Beta 1 of it still has 1.15.90-5)? It was build on Aug 10 2006, so I guess it should be there |