Bug 1638333
Summary: | File size was not truncated for all files when tried with rebalance in progress. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Sayalee <saraut> | |
Component: | distribute | Assignee: | Tamar Shacked <tshacked> | |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Pranav Prakash <prprakas> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | rhgs-3.4 | CC: | aspandey, madam, moagrawa, nladha, prprakas, rhs-bugs, saraut, sasundar, seamurph, sheggodu, tshacked, vdas | |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream | |
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1745967 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2022-06-23 18:22:56 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1745967 |
Description
Sayalee
2018-10-11 11:00:10 UTC
As the severity associated with this bug is medium and there are no customer issues reported with this bug. Again the last time the issue was reported on 3.5.2. Based on the facts, proposing this bug for later releases. Meanwhile QE will try running the test with RHGS 3.5.4 and update the bug with relevant information. Considering the above, proposing to drop this bug from 3.5.5 @Sunil, Please share your thoughts (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #10) > As the severity associated with this bug is medium and there are no customer > issues reported with this bug. > Again the last time the issue was reported on 3.5.2. Based on the facts, > proposing this bug for later releases. > Meanwhile QE will try running the test with RHGS 3.5.4 and update the bug > with relevant information. > > Considering the above, proposing to drop this bug from 3.5.5 > > @Sunil, Please share your thoughts This is a long pending BZ to fix the behaviour, Do we have any plans to pick this up in future batch updates? if not, can we close this BZ? (In reply to Sunil Kumar Acharya from comment #11) > (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #10) > > As the severity associated with this bug is medium and there are no customer > > issues reported with this bug. > > Again the last time the issue was reported on 3.5.2. Based on the facts, > > proposing this bug for later releases. > > Meanwhile QE will try running the test with RHGS 3.5.4 and update the bug > > with relevant information. > > > > Considering the above, proposing to drop this bug from 3.5.5 > > > > @Sunil, Please share your thoughts > > This is a long pending BZ to fix the behaviour, Do we have any plans to pick > this up in future batch updates? if not, can we close this BZ? I would like to propose the following: 1. Move this bug out of RHGS 3.5.5 2. QE will reproduce the same test steps with RHGS 3.5.5 ( or RHGS 3.5.4 ) 3. Estimate the impact of the issue 4. Device a workaround, if possible. 5. Based on 3 and 4, we can either CLOSE this bug or target it for future releases Hope this helps. @Sunil, moving this bug out of 3.5.5 Hi @ The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 365 days |