Bug 163870
Summary: | Global Firefox plugins are not carried forward during an update | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Matt Miller <ublinux-support> |
Component: | firefox | Assignee: | Christopher Aillon <caillon> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | don-redhat-z6y |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | massRequestForReproduction | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-04-14 15:55:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matt Miller
2005-07-21 18:29:53 UTC
Is there any reason that the firefox package couldn't include most of the common plugins? I have jre installed but not the java plugin. And it's not a trivial matter to get it. Ideally the new version should come with all plugins installed and just enable the ones that were enabled before. If you say that the jre package should supply the plugin, that's fine with me (if you can get them to do it), but installing firefox should still install it (if it's there). Since this bugzilla report was filed, we have seriously upgraded Gecko-related packages, which may have resolved this issue. Users who have experienced this problem are encouraged to upgrade their system to the latest version of their distribution available. Please, confirm to us that this bug is reproducible on the latest upgrade of the supported distribution (that's RHEL, or Fedora 7, 8, and Rawhide). Setting the bug to NEEDINFO. If I won't get confirmation of reproducability in 30 days, the bug will be closed as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. [This is mass-changing of bugs which seem to be too old and irrelevant anymore; we are sorry, if this bug should not be incldued.] Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you. Since there are insufficient details provided in this report for us to investigate the issue further, and we have not received feedback to the information we have requested above, we will assume the problem was not reproducible, or has been fixed in one of the updates we have released for the reporter's distribution. Users who have experienced this problem are encouraged to upgrade to the latest update of their distribution, and if this issue turns out to still be reproducible in the latest update, please reopen this bug with additional information. Closing as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Also, note that /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins has always worked (for 32bit, for 64bit use lib64) |