Bug 1640525

Summary:	[Ceph-Ansible] Missing fourth and fifth scenarios in osds.yml.sample
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Persona non grata <nobody+410372>
Component:	Ceph-Ansible	Assignee:	Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ameena Suhani S H <amsyedha>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.1	CC:	amsyedha, aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, dsavinea, gmeno, nthomas, tchandra, tserlin, vashastr
Target Milestone:	z2
Target Release:	3.3
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHEL: ceph-ansible-3.2.36-1.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph-ansible_3.2.36-2redhat1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-12-19 17:59:09 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Persona non grata 2018-10-18 09:35:13 UTC

Description of problem:
In this following link
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/blob/stable-3.1/group_vars/osds.yml.sample#L50
It tells that " You can use this option with First and Forth and Fifth OSDS scenario", but Forth and Fifth scenarios descriptions are not found in that osds.yml.sample.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ceph-ansible-3.1.9-1.el7cp.noarch

How reproducible:
NA

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
Descriptions of forth and fifth OSDS scenarios are missing.

Expected results:

Descriptions of forth and fifth OSDS scenarios should be mentioned.

Additional info:

Comment 3 Sébastien Han 2018-11-07 11:54:52 UTC

This is a leftover and the line should be removed.
Thanks

Comment 4 Noah Watkins 2018-11-16 01:06:54 UTC

Merged upstream.

Comment 5 Giridhar Ramaraju 2019-08-05 13:11:14 UTC

Updating the QA Contact to a Hemant. Hemant will be rerouting them to the appropriate QE Associate. 

Regards,
Giri

Comment 6 Giridhar Ramaraju 2019-08-05 13:12:15 UTC

Updating the QA Contact to a Hemant. Hemant will be rerouting them to the appropriate QE Associate. 

Regards,
Giri

Comment 11 Ameena Suhani S H 2019-11-13 07:08:45 UTC

Hi,
The issue is still seen in ceph-ansible-3.2.34-1.el7cp.noarch.
Moving to ASSIGNED state.

Comment 12 Vasishta 2019-11-13 11:13:54 UTC

Commit [1] has fixes for this BZ which was not backported

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/commit/64dee9be0c8e6ce4cfe01bf7c9956efacc195ba4#diff-6811c0962f7a6681615e383130868fa3

I think above commit needs to be backported to stable-3.2 branch.


Regards,
Vasishta Shastry
QE, Ceph

Comment 17 Ameena Suhani S H 2019-11-21 09:56:31 UTC

Verified using ceph-ansible-3.2.36-1.el7cp.noarch.
Moving to "VERIFIED' state

Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2019-12-19 17:59:09 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4353