Bug 164289

Summary: rpmbuild fails - popt not updated
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sammy <umar>
Component: rpmAssignee: Paul Nasrat <nobody+pnasrat>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: twaugh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 4.4.2-3 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-25 22:13:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Sammy 2005-07-26 16:26:54 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.4; Linux; X11; en_US) KHTML/3.4.2 (like Gecko)

Description of problem:
rpmbuild failed just before writing rpm's with the message: 
 
getOutputFrom(): Broken pipe 
 
ALSO: popt versioning went down so popt package was not updated by yum. I am not 
sure if these are related or not. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
1. update using yum 
2. popt not updated 
3. 
   

Additional info:

Comment 1 Paul Nasrat 2005-07-26 16:48:26 UTC
popt versioning unrelated, will be fixed in next rebuild.

Can you add to ~/.rpmmacros and try another build

%__perl_provides       /usr/lib/rpm/perl.prov
%__perl_requires       /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req


Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2005-07-27 09:54:21 UTC
[Off-Bugzilla] Paul, requires for popt is 1.10.1 anyway (rpm-4.4.2-2) - and 
wrong! Please change to 1.10.2, that the right popt version is always required 
by rpm...

Comment 3 Paul Nasrat 2005-07-27 12:13:06 UTC
Yup picked that up this morning - apologies for oversight. 4.4.2-3 building now
should be in next rawhide.

Comment 4 Jeff Johnson 2005-08-27 02:00:05 UTC
popt version is not the bug, either (or any recent) popt will do.

getOutputFrom() is the bug here.