Bug 1644610

Summary: [RFE] allow --no-systemd flag for 'simple' sub-command
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Sébastien Han <shan>
Component: Ceph-VolumeAssignee: Andrew Schoen <aschoen>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Yogesh Mane <ymane>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Bara Ancincova <bancinco>
Priority: high    
Version: 4.0CC: adeza, aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, gmeno, hnallurv, jbrier, pasik, pbyregow, seb, shan, tchandra, tserlin, vashastr, ymane
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 3.3   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-12.2.12-30.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_12.2.12-24redhat1xenial Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-08-21 15:10:24 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Sébastien Han 2018-10-31 09:04:06 UTC
Description of problem:

ceph-volume is not capable of activating containerized OSDs.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

[root@ceph-osd0 ~]# ceph-volume simple activate 1 04271cdf-a533-4bfb-b310-492c936f3e7a --no-systemd
usage: ceph-volume simple activate [-h] [--file FILE] [ID] [FSID]
ceph-volume simple activate: error: unrecognized arguments: --no-systemd

Actual results:

OSDs won’t start after an upgrade
The --no-systemd flag does not exist

Expected results:

ceph-volume must manage ceph-disk’s OSDs and restart them after an upgrade to 4.0
The --no-systemd exists

Additional info:

This is a must-have for the ceph-disk to ceph-volume transition.

Comment 8 seb 2018-11-27 09:50:43 UTC
Not a blocker for 3.2.

Comment 13 Alfredo Deza 2018-12-17 13:49:27 UTC
I don't understand how this is suddenly an issue for 3.2 if the feature request was initially targeted for 4.0. I don't think there is any Release Note needed here.

@Sebastien do you think this warrants a release note? Mind clarifying if you really need this for 3.2?

Comment 14 Sébastien Han 2018-12-17 16:00:17 UTC
@Alfredo, I changed the flag so the engine will stop retargetting this for 3.*

Comment 27 errata-xmlrpc 2019-08-21 15:10:24 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2538