Bug 1648197

Summary:	httpcomponents-client-4.5.6-1.fc30.noarch is excluded
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	George R. Goffe <grgoffe>
Component:	httpcomponents-client	Assignee:	Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk>
Status:	CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	grgoffe, java-sig-commits, jerboaa, krzysztof.daniel, mizdebsk, mkoncek, sochotni
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-01-21 09:21:16 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description George R. Goffe 2018-11-09 05:26:26 UTC

Description of problem:

Attempting to upgrade FC30 x86_64 caused error messages

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

httpcomponents-client-4.5.5-5.fc29.noarch

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.dnf -y --best --skip-broken upgrade httpcomponents-client-cache.noarch
2.
3.

Actual results:

See below

Expected results:


Additional info:

dnf -y --best --skip-broken upgrade httpcomponents-client-cache.noarch
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:29 ago on Thu 08 Nov 2018 09:17:32 PM PST.
Error: 
 Problem: package httpcomponents-client-cache-4.5.6-1.fc30.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient) = 4.5.6, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package httpcomponents-client-cache-4.5.5-5.fc29.noarch

Comment 1 Marián Konček 2019-01-18 10:46:26 UTC

The bug is not reproducible. Is it possible that the issue is already resolved?

Comment 2 Marián Konček 2019-01-18 10:55:38 UTC

Can the reporter provide additional information on how to reproduce this bug?

Comment 3 George R. Goffe 2019-01-19 00:00:52 UTC

Marian,

My current levels for this package are higher than those reported here so I would "assume" that the problem is resolved.

Thanks for your help and time,

George...