Bug 1648274
Summary: | dnf fails to refresh expired metadata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tom Hughes <tom> | ||||||
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Marek Blaha <mblaha> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
Version: | 29 | CC: | bitlord0xff, carl, chepioq, cvanewijk, dmach, ggr.seaton, gtwilliams, mblaha, mhatina, nixuser, packaging-team-maint, petersen, pmatilai, rmy, robatino, roger.k.wells, rpm-software-management, vmukhame | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | dnf-4.1.0-1.fc29 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2019-02-21 02:56:52 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Tom Hughes
2018-11-09 10:05:26 UTC
*** Bug 1648142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1655610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hi, I'm not sure if this is the same bug I think I'm experiencing, but if it is I guess you should give it a higher priority (new release/backporting fixes ...). Default `metadata_expire` is 7days, but after checking for updates dnf happily says (this is saved from one of dnf runs, I now always run it with `--refresh`): Last metadata expiration check: 16 days, 13:08:44 ago on Mon 17 Dec 2018 09:38:39 PM CET. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! And if you force it with `--refresh` it updates metadata and offers to update packages as well. I was experiencing this on multiple f29 systems. *** Bug 1669118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 1528471 [details]
First nothing to do and then Waiting for process with pid 3267 to finish.
Waiting for process means, that another process has locked cache / database. It could be for example dnf-makecache.timer, another dnf process, packagekit... Please, what version of dnf are you using ($ rpm -q dnf libdnf)? [cewijk@linux ~]$ rpm -q dnf libdnf dnf-4.0.9-2.fc29.noarch libdnf-0.22.3-1.fc29.x86_64 Created attachment 1534685 [details]
Dnf upgrade session report 4
libcomps-0.1.10-2.fc29 libdnf-0.26.0-1.fc29 dnf-plugins-core-4.0.4-1.fc29 dnf-plugins-extras-4.0.2-1.fc29 dnf-4.1.0-1.fc29 librepo-1.9.4-1.fc29 createrepo_c-0.12.1-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1fccede810 createrepo_c-0.12.1-1.fc29, dnf-4.1.0-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-core-4.0.4-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-extras-4.0.2-1.fc29, libcomps-0.1.10-2.fc29, libdnf-0.26.0-1.fc29, librepo-1.9.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1fccede810 createrepo_c-0.12.1-1.fc29, dnf-4.1.0-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-core-4.0.4-1.fc29, dnf-plugins-extras-4.0.2-1.fc29, libcomps-0.1.10-2.fc29, libdnf-0.26.0-1.fc29, librepo-1.9.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |