Bug 1648628
Summary: | [downstream clone - 4.2.8] [RFE] - Certify OVS from OSP 13 via Neutron API with external OSP provider on RHV 4.2.z | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Dan Kenigsberg <danken> |
Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Dominik Holler <dholler> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Michael Burman <mburman> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 4.2.0 | CC: | danken, dholler, lsurette, mburman, mmirecki, mtessun, myakove, nyechiel, ratamir, Rhev-m-bugs, rhv-bugzilla-bot, sbonazzo, srevivo |
Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.2.8 | Keywords: | FutureFeature, TestOnly, ZStream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: |
Neutron from OSP 13 configured to use OVS can be used as an external network provider on RHV 4.2.z.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 1630861 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2019-01-28 13:45:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Network | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1598391, 1630861 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Dan Kenigsberg
2018-11-11 08:37:37 UTC
Verified upstream with: vdsm-hook-openstacknet-4.20.44-10.git7e27562.el7.noarch openvswitch-2.9.0-56.el7fdp.x86_64 openstack-neutron-openvswitch-12.0.3-5.el7ost.noarch (rhv nodes VMs) openstack-neutron-openvswitch-12.0.4-2.el7ost.noarch (controller VM) Red Hat OpenStack Platform release 13.0 (Queens) 4.2.8-0.1.el7ev This bug should have been moved to ON_QA..any idea why not? Sandro, can you please move it to ON_QA? Dominik, have we forgotten to add this to errata? Please link to the advisory that fixes this RFE. I believe it should be closed. QE verification bot: the bug was verified upstream (In reply to Dan Kenigsberg from comment #4) > Dominik, have we forgotten to add this to errata? > Please link to the advisory that fixes this RFE. I believe it should be > closed. looks like this. |