Bug 1649743
| Summary: | FIPS: misleading "FATAL: Module xxx not found" messages when booting | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Renaud Métrich <rmetrich> | ||||
| Component: | dracut | Assignee: | Lukáš Nykrýn <lnykryn> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation> | ||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | high | ||||||
| Version: | 7.6 | CC: | dracut-maint-list, michael.dahl, mmatsuya | ||||
| Target Milestone: | beta | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | dracut-033-560.el7 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2019-08-06 13:13:38 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Renaud Métrich
2018-11-14 12:31:25 UTC
I have another customer case about this bug. I thought why sha1-mb and sha256-mb modules were not added into initramfs even if those (sha1 and sha256) are listed as fips modules. It's aliases for sha1-mb and sha256-mb modules. So, I think those aliases should be resolved into the actual module file name. I will attach a proposed patch. Masahiro Matsuya Created attachment 1520951 [details]
proposed patch
There is already a different patch from Renaud that should fix the issue https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/commit/01ffcf342ae65984c655f10a2fd35019a492ee5c devel_ack for including that to 7.7 That's good to hear. Renaud++ Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2289 |