Bug 1651163

Summary: [Errata UI Count, Content View] -- Count for errata is shown wrong in content view page
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Omkar Khatavkar <okhatavk>
Component: PulpAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Kersom <koliveir>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.5.0CC: dkliban, jomitsch, sghai
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-01-15 20:30:49 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Respositories added in content view
none
wrong count shown in content view none

Description Omkar Khatavkar 2018-11-19 10:39:17 UTC 
Created attachment 1507170 [details]
Respositories added in content view

Description of problem:
Count for errata is shown wrong in content view page. As per my understanding it should be the sum of all errata's present in repositories.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.5.4

How reproducible:
always 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Repositories with module streams such as https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/28/Modular/x86_64/ and https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/fixtures/rpm-with-modules/
2. Sync the repos.
3. attach both repo to content view 
4. see the count in content view.

Actual results:
Currently shown as 6 only.

Expected results:
Count of Errata should be sum of errata's in repositories, which in this case should be 31. 

Additional info:
attachment added
Comment 1 Omkar Khatavkar 2018-11-19 10:40:08 UTC 
Created attachment 1507171 [details]
wrong count shown in content view
Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2019-12-03 16:34:58 UTC 
The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.
Comment 7 Bryan Kearney 2020-01-15 20:30:49 UTC 
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support. Thank you.