Bug 1652081 (CVE-2015-9274)

Summary: CVE-2015-9274 harfbuzz: DoS due to GPOS and GSUB table mishandling
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Laura Pardo <lpardo>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: abhgupta, caolanm, dbaker, eng-i18n-bugs, erack, erik-fedora, gecko-bugs-nobody, i18n-bugs, jhorak, jokerman, klember, moceap, pnemade, psatpute, rh-spice-bugs, sthangav, stransky, trankin, tuxator
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-04-09 12:02:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1652082    

Description Laura Pardo 2018-11-21 14:34:06 UTC 
HarfBuzz before 1.0.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid read of two bytes and application crash) because of GPOS and GSUB table mishandling, related to hb-ot-layout-gpos-table.hh, hb-ot-layout-gsub-table.hh, and hb-ot-layout-gsubgpos-private.hh. 


References:
https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/commit/c917965b9e6fe2b21ed6c51559673288fa3af4b7
Comment 1 Parag Nemade 2018-11-22 15:13:57 UTC 
so Is there any public bug that I can look? Is there any fix really needed?
Comment 3 Parag Nemade 2018-12-20 05:21:03 UTC 
I am removing myself as I think this bug should have closed actually as all the releases have given their resolution already. There is nothing should be remained to take action for this CVE.