Bug 1653241
Summary: | Missing conflict in spec | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek> |
Component: | nss | Assignee: | nss-nspr-maint <nss-nspr-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8.0 | CC: | astepano, dueno, hkario, nmavrogi, tmraz |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-12-12 15:26:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jaroslav Mracek
2018-11-26 11:11:33 UTC
Thank you for the report and the suggestion. > Conflicts: nss < %{version}-%{release} Does that mean there should be only a single NSS version installable on the system, whether it is multilib or not? It seems we previously allowed installation of parallel versions of NSS for the nss-pem dependency on NSS (bug 1316546 comment 11), while the package is gone in RHEL-8 (bug 1542409). isn't there a dedicated flag for saying that the secondary package needs to be at the same version as the primary package?
this:
> Conflicts: nss < %{version}-%{release}
seems to abuse the conflict resolution...
also, will it work for preventing update of just the secondary package?
Please do not add non-sensical Conflicts into multilib spec files to workaround dnf deficiencies! This should be clearly rejected! correction, that looks like a deficiency of dnf, see https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/834 and bug 1653683 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1640985 *** |