Bug 165481

Summary:	setting socket defalt timeout error causes uncaught SSL.WantReadErrror/SSL.WantWriteError
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	Adrian Likins <alikins>
Component:	rhnlib	Assignee:	Mihai Ibanescu <mihai.ibanescu>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Beth Nackashi <bnackash>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHBA-2005-742	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-10-05 11:20:37 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	156323, 165360

Description Adrian Likins 2005-08-09 18:28:27 UTC

Description of problem:

see also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144704

If you set a socket timeout (say, socket.setdefaulttimeout(5)) and
make the socket non-blocking, openssl will raise a WANT_READ_ERROR
that pyopenssl raises as an exception, but rhnlib never catches,
causing stuff to break. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhnlib-1.8-6.p24.1

How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. add a socket.setdefaulttimeout(1) to any app that uses pyopenssl/rhnlib

Comment 2 Mihai Ibanescu 2005-08-10 13:41:35 UTC

Should be fixed by rhnlib-1.8-6.p23.1

Comment 4 Beth Nackashi 2005-08-11 17:18:21 UTC

works fine now

[root@fmoquete-64 ~]# rpm -q up2date
up2date-4.4.39-4
[root@fmoquete-64 ~]# rpm -q redhat-release
redhat-release-4Desktop-2.4
[root@fmoquete-64 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Desktop release 4 (Nahant Update 1)
[root@fmoquete-64 ~]# rpm -q firstboot
firstboot-1.3.39-2
[root@fmoquete-64 ~]# rpm -q rhnlib
rhnlib-1.8.1-1.p23.1

Comment 5 Todd Warner 2005-09-23 20:33:37 UTC

PROD_READY-->RELEASE_PENDING

Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 11:20:37 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-742.html