Bug 1656282

Summary:	Rename gpg to gpg1
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Igor Raits <igor.raits>
Component:	gnupg	Assignee:	Brian Lane <bcl>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	31	CC:	bcl, rdieter, tmraz, wk
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-09-22 11:30:13 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1656206

Description Igor Raits 2018-12-05 07:16:14 UTC

Since the referenced change has been approved, it's good time to make move.

I believe that changes should be following:
* Rename package to gnupg1
* Rename binaries/manpages to have suffix "1"

Comment 1 Brian Lane 2018-12-05 22:41:47 UTC

Here's the review request bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656640

Files are in here:

https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/gnupg1/

github repo:

https://github.com/bcl/fedora-gnupg1

Comment 2 Werner Koch 2018-12-06 07:41:54 UTC

Hi!

Note that the the next maintenance release of GnuPG 1.4 will also drop support for keyservers and external photo viewers.  The keyserver helper programs will thus also not get installed.  You may want to consider to remove them right now; for example by using "./configure --disable-exec".  See also https://dev.gnupg.org/T3443

Comment 3 Brian Lane 2018-12-06 16:35:34 UTC

Thanks, I've updated the spec to turn that off.

Comment 4 Igor Raits 2018-12-08 13:50:53 UTC

Brian,

what do you think about building gnupg1 package for F28/F29 which would ship both gpg and gpg1 while F30+ would ship only gpg1?

This would simplify compatibility between Fedora versions. I can prepare patch if you want.

Comment 5 Werner Koch 2018-12-10 08:09:24 UTC

If you do that you should put a note into the NEWS (or whatever file) to explain that gpg2 migrates the secret keys to a new format and that from then on gpg1 will not see any new secret keys.

Comment 6 Brian Lane 2018-12-10 17:20:15 UTC

Adding a gpg1 symlink to f28/29 sounds fine. I think we also need to add a README.Fedora to the f30 version with more info about migrating keys, and turning off the keyserver support.

Comment 7 Ben Cotton 2019-08-13 16:47:46 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle.
Changing version to '31'.

Comment 8 Miro Hrončok 2019-09-22 11:30:13 UTC

Automation has figured out the package is retired in Fedora 31.

If you like it to be unretired, please open a ticket at https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=package_unretirement