Bug 1658718
Summary: | Drop line with port 10080 from WA Port Numbers table (result of BZ 1655433) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Martin Bukatovic <mbukatov> |
Component: | doc-RHGS_Web_Administration | Assignee: | Rakesh <rghatvis> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Elena Bondarenko <ebondare> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rhgs-3.4 | CC: | apaladug, asriram, ebondare, nthomas, rhs-bugs, sankarshan |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
Target Release: | RHGS 3.4.z Batch Update 3 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-02-08 13:09:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1655433 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1660873 |
Description
Martin Bukatovic
2018-12-12 17:54:59 UTC
We may consider adding that one can open the port, if access to graphite-web is necessary. But with a note that access there is not encrypted or authenticated. Nishanth, does it make sense? This is similar to older BZ 1643605 Drop line with port 3000 from WA Port Numbers table. (In reply to Martin Bukatovic from comment #1) > We may consider adding that one can open the port, if access to graphite-web > is necessary. But with a note that access there is not encrypted or > authenticated. Nishanth, does it make sense? Yep, Can add that note The table and notes look OK to me. |