Bug 165956

Summary:	Review Request: libesmtp. SMTP client library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Patrice Dumas <pertusus>
Component:	libesmtp	Assignee:	Pawel Salek <pawsa>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, kevin
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---	Flags:	kevin: fedora-cvs+
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	http://www.stafford.uklinux.net/libesmtp/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-08-15 12:25:46 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Patrice Dumas 2005-08-15 10:13:13 UTC

SRPM Name or Url: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/docs/fc-srpms/libesmtp-1.0.3r1-3.src.rpm

Description: 

LibESMTP is a library to manage posting (or submission of) electronic
mail using SMTP to a preconfigured Mail Transport Agent (MTA) such as
Exim. It may be used as part of a Mail User Agent (MUA) or another
program that must be able to post electronic mail but where mail
functionality is not the program's primary purpose.

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2005-08-15 10:17:47 UTC

This was in core before. It is allready in the fedora extra cvs, but with
different patches. The two patches that are in the srpm I submit (that come from
core) are removed and instead there is a patch for the autotools that it seems
we don't need on FC-4 and FC-devel.

Comment 2 Patrice Dumas 2005-08-15 10:18:29 UTC

This is a dependancy for esmtp.

Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2005-08-15 11:12:41 UTC

Since the package is in Extras already, reassigning this to the package maintainer.

Comment 4 Patrice Dumas 2005-08-15 12:25:46 UTC

I hadn't seen that this was published allready... I wouldn't have submitted it.
Maybe I can close the bug. I don't know exactly what resolution to use though.

Comment 5 Patrice Dumas 2007-11-13 18:32:13 UTC

I didn't found anything better than a wrong submission 
for asking for branches... I can also request ownership in
the packagedb.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: libesmtp
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated EPEL Owners: pertusus

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-13 20:09:17 UTC

Pawel: Is it ok for Patrice to maintain the EPEL branches of this package? 
Or did you want to yourself?

Comment 7 manuel wolfshant 2007-11-13 20:41:35 UTC

kevin: Patrice is the maintainer of the package and just wants to add it to
EPEL. Pawel was the reviewer.

Comment 8 manuel wolfshant 2007-11-13 20:46:46 UTC

Oh well, please ignore the previous comment. Sorry for the noise.

Comment 9 Pawel Salek 2007-11-13 20:56:31 UTC

Kevin: Yes EPEL branches being maintained by Patrice are ok with me, I am not
jealous! :)

Comment 10 Kevin Fenzi 2007-11-13 21:05:27 UTC

cvs done. 

Thanks for the rapid response.