Bug 1660135

Summary:	[DDF] I had to also install the dlm package in order for step 2 to create a working resource.
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8	Reporter:	Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Steven J. Levine <slevine>
Documentation sub component:	DDF	QA Contact:
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	Docs Contact:
Severity:	unspecified
Priority:	high	CC:	nwahl, rhel-docs, slevine
Version:	8.0	Flags:	tcapek: mirror+
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	8.0
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-05-17 19:03:44 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2018-12-17 15:19:29 UTC

I had to also install the dlm package in order for step 2 to create a working resource.

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8-beta/html/configuring_and_managing_high_availability_clusters/assembly_configuring-gfs2-in-a-cluster-configuring-and-managing-high-availability-clusters#annotations:6c0ab126-d91a-4fb4-9f91-608970b68d36

Comment 1 Reid Wahl 2018-12-28 04:54:11 UTC

Verified. As it stands, the dlm package can't be a dependency of the lvm2-lockd package AFAIK. lvm2-lockd and dlm-lib are in AppStream, while dlm is in Resilient Storage.

Can we check with PM on whether this is the desired placement?

Comment 2 Steven J. Levine 2019-03-01 15:27:54 UTC

I had this exchange with Chris Feist:

----
>
> In our procedure for configuring a GFS2 file system in a cluster, we
> said this:
>
> "On both nodes of the cluster, install the lvm2-lockd and gfs2-utils
> packages. The lvm2-lockd package is part of the AppStream channel and
> the gfs2-utils package is part of the Resilient Storage channel.
>
> # yum install lvm2-lockd gfs2-utils"
>

Lets add dlm to that yum install line so it now reads:
# yum install lvm2-lockd gfs2-utils dlm

I'm verifying that with Dave, but I think we can go with that for now.
----

So for now it appears to be the desired placement and I'm adding it to the procedure.

Comment 3 Steven J. Levine 2019-03-01 15:37:49 UTC

I asked Chris Feist if that package placement is desired.  I'll update the docs if that changes, but for now I specify which channel each of the three packages is in.