Bug 1660295
Summary: | computes have "virtual-guest" tuning profile, instead of the expected "virtual-host" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Anil Dhingra <adhingra> |
Component: | openstack-tripleo-heat-templates | Assignee: | Emilien Macchi <emacchi> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Archit Modi <amodi> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 13.0 (Queens) | CC: | adhingra, dasmith, eglynn, jhakimra, kchamart, mburns, mschuppe, sbauza, sgordon, vromanso |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-01-30 07:37:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Anil Dhingra
2018-12-18 06:17:53 UTC
(In reply to Anil Dhingra from comment #0) > Description of problem: > > In our OSP13 deployment, the computes have "virtual-guest" tuning profile, > instead of the expected "virtual-host" > [root@atl1-cmp001 ~]# tuned-adm active > Current active profile: virtual-guest > > True as per Git - introduced in OSP13 > > with openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-8.0.7-4.el7ost. > > [1] > https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/stable/queens/roles/ > Compute.yaml#L14 > I am not sure I understand the current situation. Have you run another overcloud deploy when updating to the new THT and you still have virtual-guest as the profile? If so, do you use a custom role data file which as not the virtual-host set for computes? > > checking further > the ceph nodes have "throughput-performance", and we were wondering whether > it would be better to have "latency-performance" as a default. > > [212587568@atl1-ceph001-sata ~]$ tuned-adm active > Current active profile: throughput-performance This should be a separate BZ as this is a question to the storage team and not compute. > > > Expected results: > > looking for history/reason behind "virtual-host" to virtual-guest > Sorry, don't understand this. Please clarify |