Bug 1661882
| Summary: | Nfs-ganesha with rgw config for multi tenancy rgw users | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Manjunatha <mmanjuna> |
| Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vidushi Mishra <vimishra> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | John Brier <jbrier> |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 3.1 | CC: | assingh, cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, edonnell, gsitlani, kbader, kjosy, mbenjamin, mmanjuna, pasik, sweil, tchandra, tonay, tserlin, vumrao |
| Target Milestone: | z1 | ||
| Target Release: | 3.2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-12.2.8-64.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_12.2.8-49redhat1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.Mapping NFS exports to Object Gateway tenant user IDs works as expected
Previously, the NFS server for the Ceph Object Gateway (`nfs-ganesha`) did not correctly map Object Gateway tenants into their correct namespace. As a consequence, an attempt to map an NFS export onto Ceph Object Gateway with a tenanted user ID silently failed; the account could authenticate and NFS mounts could succeed, but the namespace did not contain buckets and objects. This bug has been fixed, and tenanted mappings are now set correctly. As a result, NFS exports can now be mapped to Object Gateway tenant user IDs and buckets and objects are visible as expected in the described situation.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-03-07 15:51:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1629656 | ||
|
Comment 8
Vikhyat Umrao
2019-01-15 18:40:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0475 The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days |